Has the stigma of naked selfies expired?

Article Image

Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos wrote a blog post detailing an alleged extortion attempt by National Enquirer publisher AMI. But the backstory is much more complicated.

Posted: Feb 8, 2019 5:50 PM
Updated: Feb 8, 2019 5:50 PM

Has the stigma run out on naked selfies between illicit celebrity lovers?

That's one reason Jeff Bezos may have felt empowered to publish a shocking memo on Medium in which he willingly revealed, in explicit detail, the contents of sexy photos sent between him and his mistress, Lauren Sanchez.

In a piece entitled "No thank you, Mr. Pecker," Bezos accused The National Enquirer and its parent company, AMI, of using photos it obtained of him for extortion and blackmail. But Bezos did not fall for it. Instead, he exposed the company by reprinting an email from AMI's Chief Content Officer, Dylan Howard, in which Howard threatened to publish "below the belt" selfies and shots of Bezos's "semi-erect manhood" should Bezos not agree to AMI's terms. (AMI responded to the allegations on Friday, stating that it "believes fervently that it acted lawfully in the reporting of the story of Mr. Bezos," but that "the Board has convened and determined that it should promptly and thoroughly investigate the claims.")

Bezos's remarkable response was less a risk than a reasonable assumption that people would be far more offended to learn of AMI's alleged bully tactics than by a few lewd photos of a 55-year-old man. Certainly sex still sells, but in 2019 there is seemingly far less shame attached to explicit texts, or even extramarital affairs, than ever before -- especially among the younger people likely to fuel Amazon's future. And if there were still power in using sex to shame, Bezos's actions may have even obliterated it for good.

In being the one to expose the news himself, Bezos removed much of the tabloid's ammunition -- they've been scooped, and big time. But in his post he also refuted AMI's claim, according to the email, that the photos were newsworthy proof that Bezos exercises terrible business judgment. After all, $137 billion net worth in less than 25 years must be worth more than a couple of naked selfies.

What the tabloid also failed to consider was Bezos' personal stake in journalistic integrity and commitment to a medium that has lately come under attack. Truly, was it ever likely that the owner of The Washington Post would kowtow to a company with, as Bezos writes, a "long-earned reputation for weaponizing journalistic privileges... and ignoring the tenets and purpose of true journalism"?

But it's no coincidence, either, that one of the Post's -- and the mainstream media's -- most vocal critics has been President Trump, who counts AMI chairman and CEO David Pecker as a friend and political supporter. In standing up to Pecker, Bezos made an important stand against the culture of bullying that Trump and his allies have helped establish -- and gained so much more than he might have lost with the printing of those photos (which would have been embarrassing, surely, but very likely not revealing much of anything that his soon-to-be-ex-wife didn't already know).

Much more memorable than a lewd photo: A man who does not let himself be a victim. As Bezos wrote, "If in my position I can't stand up to this kind of extortion, how many people can?"

And while Bezos likely knew this wasn't the first time the Enquirer is alleged to have pulled this trick -- and indeed, already journalist Ronan Farrow has come forward to allege, via Twitter, that the Enquirer tried to blackmail him and another journalist, too -- he didn't become one of the world's richest men by avoiding risk. It's likely this is another that will pay off. As he concludes in his post, "Of course I don't want personal photos published, but ... I prefer to stand up, roll this log over, and see what crawls out."

No matter what you think of lewd selfies, it's difficult, if not impossible, to argue with that position.

California Coronavirus Cases

Data is updated nightly.

Cases: 1171802

Reported Deaths: 19025
CountyCasesDeaths
Los Angeles3832757580
San Bernardino884691129
Riverside850771434
San Diego75307988
Orange731521559
Kern39990448
Fresno37349477
Sacramento35739566
Santa Clara32454476
Alameda28378502
San Joaquin25675502
Contra Costa23381260
Stanislaus21145422
Tulare20550308
Ventura18914175
Imperial15725356
San Francisco15053160
Monterey14695116
San Mateo13707170
Sonoma11846157
Merced11537179
Santa Barbara11205135
Kings1044087
Solano1003681
Marin7628129
Placer622468
Madera604785
San Luis Obispo595635
Shasta460147
Yolo456174
Santa Cruz420228
Butte385359
Sutter314415
Napa294517
El Dorado21544
Yuba198110
San Benito181316
Lassen17733
Tehama158725
Mendocino148522
Nevada11839
Tuolumne9088
Glenn8918
Lake88619
Humboldt8199
Colusa6946
Siskiyou6242
Mono5243
Amador48416
Calaveras47522
Del Norte3131
Inyo29016
Plumas2050
Trinity1390
Mariposa1262
Modoc1220
Alpine470
Sierra190
Unassigned00
Chico
Scattered Clouds
59° wxIcon
Hi: 62° Lo: 35°
Feels Like: 59°
Oroville
Clear
61° wxIcon
Hi: 61° Lo: 36°
Feels Like: 61°
Paradise
Scattered Clouds
59° wxIcon
Hi: 55° Lo: 39°
Feels Like: 59°
Chester
Clear
50° wxIcon
Hi: 48° Lo: 26°
Feels Like: 50°
Red Bluff
Clear
64° wxIcon
Hi: 66° Lo: 34°
Feels Like: 64°
Willows
Scattered Clouds
59° wxIcon
Hi: 64° Lo: 34°
Feels Like: 59°
Frosty mornings are in the forecast through the weekend with highs every day in the mid-to-low 60s and sunny to mostly sunny skies.
KHSL Severe
KHSL Radar
KHSL Temperatures

Community Events