BREAKING NEWS Sheriff: Butte County Jail inmate tests positive for coronavirus Full Story
STREAMING NOW: Watch Now

Dem questions whether Supreme Court would force Trump to comply with a Mueller subpoena

The ranking Democratic member of the House Armed Services Committee questioned if the Supreme Court would fo...

Posted: Aug 8, 2018 5:56 PM
Updated: Aug 8, 2018 5:56 PM

The ranking Democratic member of the House Armed Services Committee questioned if the Supreme Court would force President Donald Trump to comply with a potential subpoena for an interview from special counsel Robert Mueller amid continued uncertainty about whether the President will voluntarily sit for an interview with Mueller's team.

Rep. Adam Smith said in an interview Monday with CNN's Wolf Blitzer that if Trump does not agree to an interview, he's not sure the Supreme Court would force him to comply with a Mueller subpoena because he feels the conservative majority will side with Trump.

Continents and regions

Donald Trump

Eastern Europe

Europe

Government and public administration

Government bodies and offices

Government organizations - US

Investigations

Law and legal system

Political Figures - US

Politics

Robert Mueller

Russia

Russia meddling investigation

Subpoenas

Trial and procedure

US federal court system

US federal government

US Supreme Court

White House

Richard Nixon

RELATED: Mueller raised idea of subpoena with President's lawyers

"Legally, it's clear: You can't ignore a subpoena, even if you're the president of the United States," the Washington state Democrat said. "However, remember the Supreme Court that we have. If this goes all the way up to this Supreme Court ... this Supreme Court seems to make its decisions based on what Donald Trump and the Republican Party want, as opposed to precedents or the Constitution."

Trump's personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani told Politico on Thursday that Trump and his lawyers will decide whether the President will meet with Mueller in a "week to 10 days," his latest estimate on when a final decision could come.

Current precedent, established in President Richard Nixon's term during the Watergate investigation, suggests that presidents are not immune from subpoenas from investigators.

In the 1974 case US v. Nixon, the Supreme Court unanimously concluded that "the fundamental demands of due process of law" as well as the "specific need for evidence in a pending criminal trial" overrode the President's assertion that he had a constitutional right to keep communications private.

That case, however, addressed Nixon's Oval Office tapes, not an interview with investigators.

Trump's latest Supreme Court nominee, Brett Kavanaugh, said in 1999 that the Nixon case may have been "wrongly decided" in an interview with a publication called Washington Lawyer.

However, Kavanaugh said in a speech at Catholic University in 2016 that US v. Nixon was among a handful of cases that contributed to the "greatest moments in American judicial history" in which judges "stood up to the other branches, were not cowed and enforced the law."

Kavanaugh has also privately told senators he views the appointment of a special counsel by the Justice Department, in general, as appropriate. But he has told senators he continues to question if a sitting president can be indicted on criminal charges because Congress should play the lead role in impeaching and removing a president.

Senators tell CNN Kavanaugh has not specified his views on a presidential subpoena.

"We're headed towards a very, very difficult situation," Smith said Monday on "The Situation Room."

He added that Trump's tweets criticizing the Mueller investigation were likely hurting him legally and the United States as a whole.

"Obviously, from a legal standpoint, he's making things worse," Smith said. "To the extent that the President is trying to stop (the investigation), he is not only potentially committing a crime, he is harming the national security interests of the United States of America."

California Coronavirus Cases

Data is updated nightly.

Confirmed Cases: 103813

Reported Deaths: 3993
CountyConfirmedDeaths
Los Angeles498602241
Riverside7341313
San Diego7100260
Orange5744142
San Bernardino4914190
Alameda309794
Santa Clara2701140
San Francisco243740
San Mateo202282
Kern200737
Tulare183580
Fresno165832
Santa Barbara163612
Imperial144326
Contra Costa138437
Sacramento134956
Ventura106232
San Joaquin84235
Kings7043
Stanislaus68328
Sonoma5304
Solano50922
Monterey4699
Marin43614
Merced2807
San Luis Obispo2681
Yolo20723
Santa Cruz2062
Placer1969
Napa1113
Humboldt983
Madera942
San Benito852
El Dorado840
Del Norte440
Sutter422
Nevada411
Butte400
Shasta374
Mono351
Yuba281
Mendocino250
Lake230
Inyo191
Mariposa161
Calaveras150
Glenn140
Amador100
Siskiyou60
Colusa50
Lassen50
Tuolumne40
Plumas40
Tehama41
Alpine20
Trinity10
Sierra10
Unassigned00
Chico
Broken Clouds
90° wxIcon
Hi: 92° Lo: 61°
Feels Like: 90°
Oroville
Clear
91° wxIcon
Hi: 91° Lo: 62°
Feels Like: 91°
Paradise
Broken Clouds
90° wxIcon
Hi: 86° Lo: 56°
Feels Like: 90°
Chester
Clear
84° wxIcon
Hi: 83° Lo: 52°
Feels Like: 84°
Red Bluff
Clear
94° wxIcon
Hi: 99° Lo: 62°
Feels Like: 94°
Willows
Broken Clouds
90° wxIcon
Hi: 96° Lo: 60°
Feels Like: 90°
We'll be staying hot on Friday, but won't be as hot as the last few days. The potential for active weather returns Friday night into Saturday and much cooler temperatures are on the way for your weekend.
KHSL Severe
KHSL Radar
KHSL Temperatures

Community Events